Thursday, August 2, 2012

Amtrak California ridership continues to grow in 2012

This is my sixth time posting a summary of Amtrak California ridership and the story continues to be the same - more riders. Those increases come with a poor economy, no improvements in service and (slight) increases in fares. The fastest grower continues to be the San Joaquin service, which runs from Bakersfield to Oakland or Sacramento, which just so happens to be the starting point for California's future high speed rail service.

Amtrak has just released the May 2012 numbers, so lets take a look inside.



In 2008, hitting 80,000 riders on the San Joaquin was a big deal. In 2011, the train broke past 100,000 riders for the first time. This year the San Joaquin didn't even go under 80,000, and has already seen two months of 100,000+ ridership. That's with the summer ridership not being reported yet.


Contrary to what some might claim, the Fresno train station is not a sleepy little place
Photobucket



Take a look at the continuous growth. Not bad for a service that is running the same trains on the same schedule its done for years.

May 2012: 100,992


Photobucket
(I've highlighted the first five months of the year, I think it makes it easier to read)


The Capitol Corridor (Sacramento-Oakland-San Jose) is growing as well.

May 2012: 158,896
Photobucket


On the Pacific Surfliner, ridership has stalled....
May 2012: 236,375

Photobucket


But there's a reason.

Fares are going up, meaning constant increases in revenue.

Photobucket


Does that mean the San Joaquin and the Capitol Corridor are cooking to books by offering low fares?

Not exactly. Revenue is going up faster than ridership, which makes sense, as more people pay into the higher buckets.

And take a look at this, while the San Joaquin has less riders, it brings in more money than the Capitols.

Photobucket

Photobucket



This is what May ridership looks like, year on year.

Photobucket


A bigger picture, all three lines with every month I have.

Photobucket


And finally, this is how the California lines stack up against the rest of the country.

Photobucket

The rankings are pretty consistent


A northbound San Joaquin makes a rare stop on the second track, and the crowd is forced to use one of the two pedestrian crossings
Photobucket



Previous posts:
April 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August and September 2011
December 2011



Amtrak document website

4 comments:

  1. Any word on what the current subsidy is? I'd love to see these corridor become operationally profitable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How do you define "profitable"? And one observer believes this concept is an illusion...

      http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/2009/feb/15/loving215_20090213-194901-ar-67511/

      Delete
  2. Wow. Very nice set of charts. Good to see things graphically.

    The final table ranking the corridor services has been stable, as you say. But it could before a nice horserace. The Cascades service has been running four trains a day each way Seattle-Portland (plus the Coast Starlight), with two of those trains extending down to Eugene, OR. Starting next year, it will add two more Talgo trainsets, so six each way Seattle-Portland (plus the Starlight) and four trains down to Eugene. The added capacity and friendlier frequency will mean a huge increase in the ridership.

    Then in 2016 the upgraded Lincoln service Chi-St Louis will kick in, with 40 minutes out of the schedule and at least one more frequency added to the current four (plus the Texas Eagle long distance train). I expect more trains to be added when the newly ordered equipment comes into service not long after that. And at about the same time, upgraded right of way in Michigan will mean faster trains on the Wolverine services, bringing rapid growth there as well.

    So the California services will have some challengers not too far down the line.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good points. I think California has room to grow, especially on the San Joaquin, if service is increased. I will write about that in the future, as the line is overdue for an added daily train.

      Delete